Strategy added by Mutanis
70
70
Average rating: |
5 |
Ratings: |
91 |
Your vote: |
|
Creator |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tags
Filter strategies:
These options reset all other sorting filters. |
|||||||||
Script |
2 | 5.0 | 100% | 70 | 104
1:44
|
13+ | |||
I only tried this once with this team and it worked first time. Other breeds for Shadowback Crawler might also work.
Script thanks to FMJustice |
Script |
2 | 4.9 | 46% | 35 | 109
1:49
|
16+ | ||
Updated with the Tideskipper in slot #3
Video for Fight: Pre-Tideskipper |
Breed Script |
2 | 4.6 | 99% | 6 | 110
1:50
|
18+ | ||
I haven't had Bloodbiter kill my Lightless ambusher, so the moves outlined below are my best guess for how it would go; the script reflects these moves.
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 | 96% | 3 | 88
1:28
|
11-13 | ||
This is a variation of Mutanis' strategy using a Young Mutant Warturtle and a slower Benax breed than in his strategy.
My Benax is a H/P breed, so its slower than his recommended 255 - still worked for me. Young Mutant Warturtle also doesnt have to be a rare one. The green one works aswell. (I used a H/P one) |
Script |
2 | 5.0 | 79% | 4 | 101
1:41
|
13-14 | ||
Many family battler strategies use rare, or raid-looted pets. This strategy aims to offer an accessible way of dealing with this fight, using only easy-to-get pets. Enjoy ! :)
|
Script |
2 | 3.1 | 62% | 5 | 131
2:11
|
20 | ||
A lot of potential for failure due to the 10% increased chance to miss during Darkness, but I won't put additional stuff into steps or script.
When it's only about killing Bloodripper, I think you can do that on your own, or just restart. Good luck! The pets suggested for the first two slots have a ton of available breeds, so I could only test what I've got. |
Breed RNG Script |
2 | 0.0 | 96% | 0 | 95
1:35
|
12+ | ||
RNG |
2 | 0.0 | N/A | 0 | 110
1:50
|
13+ | |||
2 | 0.0 | N/A | 0 | 9999999- | - |
Incl. steps:
Skills: 1 * *
Breed: Any
Breed | Health | Power | Speed |
---|---|---|---|
HH | 1766 | 268 | 244 |
HP | 1587 | 297 | 244 |
HS | 1587 | 268 | 273 |
Substitutes:
1 / 3
Benax | HP |
Toothy | PS |
Tideskipper | HH |
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Terrible Tina? Sounds like a familiar Wonderland!
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsMagicKira#1404
wrote on 2024-02-26 12:11:40
0
You must be logged in to vote on commentsRaelynn wrote on 2024-01-09 19:28:24
0
You must be logged in to vote on commentsQuantumDeth wrote on 2023-12-15 06:22:56
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsQatarra
wrote on 2023-04-01 22:47:53
0
You must be logged in to vote on commentsStormkat wrote on 2023-01-15 05:40:41
2
You must be logged in to vote on commentsSolitha
wrote on 2023-01-14 18:34:12
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsOwllett#1532
wrote on 2022-12-16 02:42:21
2
You must be logged in to vote on commentsvannevar
wrote on 2022-12-15 14:02:48
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsIamgladious
wrote on 2022-12-12 16:49:38
(edited)
2
You must be logged in to vote on commentsRoxatha#2285
wrote on 2022-11-30 14:56:31
New Comment: